Stillwater News Press

Opinion

April 12, 2014

DONNA BRAZILE: Should you have the right to buy an election?

STILLWATER, Okla. — If you believe money is speech, corporations are people, and the wealthiest 1 percent are a persecuted minority, then you will love the recent Supreme Court decision on campaign finance (McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission) and where it is pointing our political process.

To understand the meaning and impact of the decision, we have to look back at what the Supreme Court has already done to increase the power of big money in national politics. Then we have to look forward to what, given the signals, the court intends to do next.

The guiding principle certainly seems to be getting rid of any limits on election spending by mega-donors.

Standard PACs can be directly affiliated with candidates and campaigns, but only individuals can make contributions to a PAC. Additionally, there are limits on the size of contributions made to a PAC and on those made by the group to a candidate or party.

With the Citizens United decision in 2010, the Supreme Court gave a green light to wealthy donors giving unlimited amounts of money to super PACs. While super PACs cannot make contributions to candidates’ campaigns or parties, they can engage in unlimited political spending – supposedly independently of the campaigns.

But there are ways around that. In some instances, candidates have had longtime staff resign, then form and run the super PACs. Using super PACs, mega-donors can, and have, carpet-bombed opposition candidates without the benefiting candidates themselves being held accountable for the negative campaigns.

Chief Justice John Roberts said the influence of a single contributor will be “significantly diluted by all the contributions from others,” and thus lessen the chances for corruption. However, in practice during the 2012 presidential election, the bulk of contributors to super PACs came from a handful of anonymous donors.

And now, the Supreme Court has whisked away the total limit on how many candidates, affiliated committees and standard PACs an individual can contribute to: While there remains a limit on how much money can be given to any one candidate, committee or PAC, there is no limit on the number of contributions. Before the decision, an individual donor could only give a total of $123,200 to political candidates and committees during any two-year election cycle. After last week’s Supreme Court decision, a single donor will be able to give $3.6 million dollars in this same two-year election cycle.

That $3.6 million is a drop in the bucket compared to the $100 million that casino magnate and Republican mega-donor Sheldon Adelson spent in the 2012 cycle. But this week’s McCutcheon decision certainly does not roll back the proliferation of money in our election cycles.

In the 2012 election cycle, spending by non-political groups topped $1 billion, and super PACS (aided by the older Citizens United case), contributed $600 million to that final tally.

Citizens United also ushered in a new era of “dark money” groups – nonprofits that can legally unleash unlimited expenditures from anonymous contributors, such as for-profit corporations. These dark money groups spent $256 million in 2012. While many of them, including Karl Rove’s Crossroads GPS, had abysmal success records, the mere threat of these groups escalates the money race and makes public officials and candidates more beholden to high-dollar donors.

This case was decided by the narrowest margin, 5 to 4. In his dissent from the bench, Justice Stephen Breyer said that if the Citizens United decision “opened a door,” this decision “may well open a floodgate.”

Donna Brazile is a senior Democratic strategist and a political commentator.

1
Text Only | Photo Reprints
Opinion
Buy & Share Photos
NewsPress e-Edition
NewsPress Specials
AP Video
Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue Raw: Corruption Trial Begins for Former Va Gov. The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming UN Security Council Calls for Gaza Cease-fire Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating 13 Struck by Lightning on Calif. Beach Baseball Hall of Famers Inducted Israel, Hamas Trade Fire Despite Truce in Gaza Italy's Nibali Set to Win First Tour De France Raw: Shipwrecked Concordia Completes Last Voyage Raw: Sea Turtle Hatchlings Emerge From Nest Raw: Massive Dust Storm Covers Phoenix 12-hour Cease-fire in Gaza Fighting Begins Raw: Bolivian Dancers Attempt to Break Record Raw: Israel, Palestine Supporters Rally in US Raw: Air Algerie Flight 5017 Wreckage
Stocks
NDN Video
'Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1' Sneak Peek GMA: Dog passes out from excitment to see owner Chapter Two: Designing for Naomi Watts Baseball Hall of Famers Inducted Florida Keys Webcam Captures Turtles Hatching Morgan Freeman Sucks Down Helium on 'Tonight Show' Robin Wright Can Dance! (WATCH) She's Back! See Paris Hilton's New Carl's Jr. Ad Big Weekend For Atlanta Braves In Cooperstown - @TheBuzzeronFox Chapter Two: Becoming a first-time director What's Got Jack Black Freaking Out at Comic-Con? Doctors Remove 232 Teeth From Teen's Mouth Bradley Cooper Explains His Voice in 'Guardians of the Galaxy' Deja vu: Another NYPD officer choke-holding a suspect 'Fifty Shades of Grey': Watch the Super Sexy First Trailer Now! Reports: Ravens RB Ray Rice Suspended For 1st 2 Games Of The Season Air Algerie plane with 119 on board missing over Mali Diamond Stone, Malik Newman, Josh Jackson and others showcase talent Free Arturo - The World's Saddest Polar Bear A Look Back at Batman On Film Through The Years
Must Read